Hi,
There is a table which contains the rows and I would like to create a query
that can show the below result. Can a query do that?
Thanks
Table
--
Owner Cat Name
1 1 Kitap
1 2 Defter
1 3 Kalem
1 2 Dergi
2 1 Ceket
2 1 Gmlek
2 2 Kravat
2 3 orap
2 3 Pantolon
---
The Query result
Owner Cat Name
1 1 Kitap
1 2 Defter
1 3 Kalem
2 1 Ceket
2 2 Kravat
2 3 orap
---A query can probably do this, but you will have to tell us
how you decide which Name to return when there is more
than one row with the same Owner and Cat values. Here,
it looks like you are choosing the one that appears first in
the list of all table rows, but in order to do this with a query,
you need to define the row you want in terms of the column
values, not a particular output order that you can't rely on.
Steve Kass
Drew University
tolgay wrote:
>Hi,
>There is a table which contains the rows and I would like to create a query
>that can show the below result. Can a query do that?
>Thanks
>
>Table
>--
> Owner Cat Name
> 1 1 Kitap
> 1 2 Defter
> 1 3 Kalem
> 1 2 Dergi
> 2 1 Ceket
> 2 1 G闣lek
> 2 2 Kravat
> 2 3 よrap
> 2 3 Pantolon
>---
>The Query result
> Owner Cat Name
> 1 1 Kitap
> 1 2 Defter
> 1 3 Kalem
> 2 1 Ceket
> 2 2 Kravat
> 2 3 よrap
>---
>
>|||Actually it doesn't matter which row comes with the query. But the main
point is the query must get one of the rows.
Thanks
"Steve Kass" <skass@.drew.edu> wrote in message
news:u6PVjiFcGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...[vbcol=seagreen]
> A query can probably do this, but you will have to tell us
> how you decide which Name to return when there is more
> than one row with the same Owner and Cat values. Here,
> it looks like you are choosing the one that appears first in
> the list of all table rows, but in order to do this with a query,
> you need to define the row you want in terms of the column
> values, not a particular output order that you can't rely on.
> Steve Kass
> Drew University
> tolgay wrote:
>
query[vbcol=seagreen]|||in that case...
Select owner
, cat
, max(name)
from CatTable
group by owner
, cat
However, this table structure needs keys to prevent duplicates. Two rows as
shown here should never exist. You probably want to change your database
structures before doing anything else. You can guarantee that the name you
pull back will be wrong half the time.
"tolgay" <tgul@.tgul.com> wrote in message
news:%23DJTKpFcGHA.1276@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Actually it doesn't matter which row comes with the query. But the main
> point is the query must get one of the rows.
> Thanks
> "Steve Kass" <skass@.drew.edu> wrote in message
> news:u6PVjiFcGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> query
>|||Jim has offered a solution, and I'll just add that while
it doesn't matter to you, you still have to tell SQL Server
what to do. There's no ANY_OLD_ONE aggregate
in SQL.
SK
tolgay wrote:
>Actually it doesn't matter which row comes with the query. But the main
>point is the query must get one of the rows.
>Thanks
>"Steve Kass" <skass@.drew.edu> wrote in message
>news:u6PVjiFcGHA.3380@.TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>
>query
>
>
>|||thanks a lot you saved my day
"tolgay" <tgul@.tgul.com> wrote in message
news:un$oOaFcGHA.3856@.TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
> There is a table which contains the rows and I would like to create a
> query
> that can show the below result. Can a query do that?
> Thanks
>
> Table
> --
> Owner Cat Name
> 1 1 Kitap
> 1 2 Defter
> 1 3 Kalem
> 1 2 Dergi
> 2 1 Ceket
> 2 1 Gmlek
> 2 2 Kravat
> 2 3 orap
> 2 3 Pantolon
> ---
> The Query result
> Owner Cat Name
> 1 1 Kitap
> 1 2 Defter
> 1 3 Kalem
> 2 1 Ceket
> 2 2 Kravat
> 2 3 orap
> ---
>
No comments:
Post a Comment