Showing posts with label manager. Show all posts
Showing posts with label manager. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 20, 2012

queries and reporting from corporative database non IT staff

Hi! we have no Business Intelligence solution in my job and the general manager asked for a query and reports system where he (and other section managers and non IT staff) could query the corporative database (we work in healthcare, so it's mostly about patients, clinic histories, treatments) so I will propose them SQL SERVER 2005. I'll tell you my general idea and maybe you could tell me if I'm right: Through Integration Services we will load our data from the corporative database (it's Borland's InterBase) and generate a datawarehouse (now we don't have a datawarehouse) then through Reporting Services we can query this datawarehouse to generate different reports (this reports can be generated for non-technical staff, but staff who knows quite a lot about for example the different treatments that different groups of patients follow, so this staff may want to query about which patients followed which treatment in a period of time and generate by himself a report about that). And through Analysis Services we could (in a future) generate some OLAP solutions, Data Mining etc

But for the query and report system it could be enough to start with Integration Services and Reporting Services? it's very important for this system to work efficiently in terms of time: the non-technical staff generates the query and in seconds receives the report result... some of this non IT staff who will use the system knows exactly which information we house in each InterBase table, so through this system they would like to generate their own queries and reports (this is a different level of non-IT staff who is in between a Medical doctor and a Software engineer, this staff does have some technical background specially in SQL.

So my idea is to have an SQL SERVER 2005 to which this staff gets connected via LAN (all this system runs locally in one corporative place, will not run through Internet) feeded by the InterBase corporative database and delivering efficiently queries and reports... is this possible? could I test this using the trial free 6 months version? and after that if everything's working fine how much will I have to pay for 15 persons to access the SQL SERVER 2005 for keeping using the system?

This sounds like a good solution. I believe there are three stages of data presentation at a company: Data storage and retrieval, a good reporting strategy, and then Business Intelligence. SQL Server 2005 contains all the tools you need to do all three. The engine (and good application programming) handles number one, SSIS and Reporting Services handles number two, and the new Analysis Services handles number three.

You can read more about what I think on this here:

http://www.informit.com/guides/content.asp?g=sqlserver&seqNum=159&rl=1

If this answers your question, make sure to mark it "answered" so that others can quickly locate it.

Buck Woody
http://www.buckwoody.com

|||

Thanks!! just one question to get the general idea: in the Data storage and retrieval part is when you create the datawarehouse? so the original data is somehow "rearranged" for the Reporting Services to query the data more efficiently..

I don't understand how the data is queried efficiently

|||

Good question - if you'll check out my series of articles I referenced in the last post, you'll see that the data warehouse is a different structure than your data store. I think you can get the reports you're looking for out of the ODS layer I talk about. Check out those articles and I think you'll find what you're looking for.

Buck

Monday, March 12, 2012

Qs on SQL Server backup using Enterprise Manager

Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
does it have options for differential backup?
Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
Remove the files older than
Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
ThanksFrankie,
First, I suggest you read up on the BACKUP and RESTORE commands in Books Onl
ine. Backup is such an important
topic, and you don't want to be in a position where you need to do restore a
nd realize that your backup
strategy causes you to loose more data than acceptable. Having said that:

> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
I assume you meant to say "doesn't it have". Maint Wiz is a basic tool. It w
as never designed for more than
the simpler scenarios. It is very difficult to answer "why?" questions. Some
one in the design team at MS made
that decision, quite simply. Probably to make the Maint Plan easier to under
stand for beginners.

> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
Because this is an immediate dialog.

> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in bo
th
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Only transaction log backup empties the transaction log. This is in order fo
r a db backup to not break the log
backup chain sequence.

> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
Transaction log records generated by transactions that are committed, and th
ere is no earlier non-committed
transaction. These are not required for SQL server to perform a possible lat
er rollback for any user.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Frankie" <Frankie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9FCB61BB-9A54-4FD9-B948-5229E9F7742E@.microsoft.com...
> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in bo
th
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
> Thanks

Qs on SQL Server backup using Enterprise Manager

Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
does it have options for differential backup?
Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
Remove the files older than
Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
ThanksFrankie,
First, I suggest you read up on the BACKUP and RESTORE commands in Books Online. Backup is such an important
topic, and you don't want to be in a position where you need to do restore and realize that your backup
strategy causes you to loose more data than acceptable. Having said that:
> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
I assume you meant to say "doesn't it have". Maint Wiz is a basic tool. It was never designed for more than
the simpler scenarios. It is very difficult to answer "why?" questions. Someone in the design team at MS made
that decision, quite simply. Probably to make the Maint Plan easier to understand for beginners.
> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
Because this is an immediate dialog.
> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Only transaction log backup empties the transaction log. This is in order for a db backup to not break the log
backup chain sequence.
> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
Transaction log records generated by transactions that are committed, and there is no earlier non-committed
transaction. These are not required for SQL server to perform a possible later rollback for any user.
--
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Frankie" <Frankie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9FCB61BB-9A54-4FD9-B948-5229E9F7742E@.microsoft.com...
> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
> Thanks

Qs on SQL Server backup using Enterprise Manager

Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
does it have options for differential backup?
Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
Remove the files older than
Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
Thanks
Frankie,
First, I suggest you read up on the BACKUP and RESTORE commands in Books Online. Backup is such an important
topic, and you don't want to be in a position where you need to do restore and realize that your backup
strategy causes you to loose more data than acceptable. Having said that:

> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
I assume you meant to say "doesn't it have". Maint Wiz is a basic tool. It was never designed for more than
the simpler scenarios. It is very difficult to answer "why?" questions. Someone in the design team at MS made
that decision, quite simply. Probably to make the Maint Plan easier to understand for beginners.

> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
Because this is an immediate dialog.

> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
Only transaction log backup empties the transaction log. This is in order for a db backup to not break the log
backup chain sequence.

> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
Transaction log records generated by transactions that are committed, and there is no earlier non-committed
transaction. These are not required for SQL server to perform a possible later rollback for any user.
Tibor Karaszi, SQL Server MVP
http://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asp
http://www.solidqualitylearning.com/
"Frankie" <Frankie@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:9FCB61BB-9A54-4FD9-B948-5229E9F7742E@.microsoft.com...
> Q1: When using All Tasks\Maintenance Plan to setup a database backup, why
> does it have options for differential backup?
> Q2: When using All Tasks\Backup Database, Why don't I have option
> Remove the files older than
> Q3: Does performing a Full database backup through Enterprise manager
> automatically remove the inactived portion in the log file (or the portion
> has been committed and written to the database)? It is grayed out in both
> Full DB backup and Diff Backup. It is only available in Log backup.
> Q4: How do you define "inactive entries"?
> Thanks

Friday, March 9, 2012

Q319697

SQL Enterprise Manager Restore to Point in Time Does Not
Stop at Requested Time
and the Database is Left in a Loading State 'Q319697'
Has anybody had problems similar to the one high-lighted
in Q319697.
Earlier this week I tried to Recover a database to a
specific point in time
but the restore went to the end of the file.
I have SP3 and MS03-031 hot fix installed both on my PC
and the server I was restoring to.
The Knowledge base article says that it is fixed in SP3,
has MS03-031 caused this?
After the initial panic I managed to restore the database
using SQL.
GaryI have the same problem that you describe even if I have SP3 installed.. Th
is is not related to MS03-031 hot fix because I don't have installed this on
e

Q319697

SQL Enterprise Manager Restore to Point in Time Does Not
Stop at Requested Time
and the Database is Left in a Loading State 'Q319697'
Has anybody had problems similar to the one high-lighted
in Q319697.
Earlier this week I tried to Recover a database to a
specific point in time
but the restore went to the end of the file.
I have SP3 and MS03-031 hot fix installed both on my PC
and the server I was restoring to.
The Knowledge base article says that it is fixed in SP3,
has MS03-031 caused this?
After the initial panic I managed to restore the database
using SQL.
GaryI have the same problem that you describe even if I have SP3 installed.. This is not related to MS03-031 hot fix because I don't have installed this one

Wednesday, March 7, 2012

q; Registration access denied

Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?You can register a SQL 2000 instance in SSMS but not a SQL 2005 instance in
EM. However, the subject of your message indicates an 'access denied'
error, which is different than a version incompatibility. Try to connecting
with SSMS and post the full error message.
--
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?|||EM will not be able to register SQL 2005 servers, AND SSMS will be able to
register SQL 2000 servers.
--
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?

q; Registration access denied

Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?You can register a SQL 2000 instance in SSMS but not a SQL 2005 instance in
EM. However, the subject of your message indicates an 'access denied'
error, which is different than a version incompatibility. Try to connecting
with SSMS and post the full error message.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?|||EM will not be able to register SQL 2005 servers, AND SSMS will be able to
register SQL 2000 servers.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?

q; Registration access denied

Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?
You can register a SQL 2000 instance in SSMS but not a SQL 2005 instance in
EM. However, the subject of your message indicates an 'access denied'
error, which is different than a version incompatibility. Try to connecting
with SSMS and post the full error message.
Hope this helps.
Dan Guzman
SQL Server MVP
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?
|||EM will not be able to register SQL 2005 servers, AND SSMS will be able to
register SQL 2000 servers.
Arnie Rowland, Ph.D.
Westwood Consulting, Inc
Most good judgment comes from experience.
Most experience comes from bad judgment.
- Anonymous
You can't help someone get up a hill without getting a little closer to the
top yourself.
- H. Norman Schwarzkopf
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:03DDAA79-2041-44F7-8FF2-ABA2BB9D2BCA@.microsoft.com...
> Am I able to register SQL2005 server in Enterprise Manager of SQL2000, or
> SQL2000 server in SQL Server Management Studio?

Monday, February 20, 2012

Q: un-deploy

Hello,
I deployed a report by mistake to our report server, how can un-deploy it. I
do not want to see it in the report manager.
Thanks,Go to Report Manager, click on 'Show Details'. Put a check mark in the box
in front of that report and click on 'Delete'
=?Utf-8?B?SklNLkgu?= <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
news:473D6912-E218-4504-BFA2-7F6C7AEB1646@.microsoft.com:
> Hello,
> I deployed a report by mistake to our report server, how can un-deploy
> it. I do not want to see it in the report manager.
> Thanks,
>

Q: report manager

Hello,
How can I make my sub-reports invisible in the report manager, I do not want
users click them and try to run.
Thanks,In report manager there is a properties tab, there is a check box for not
showing it in list view.
Bruce Loehle-Conger
MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:8815E795-7DA9-4190-AC09-3E669725A84D@.microsoft.com...
> Hello,
> How can I make my sub-reports invisible in the report manager, I do not
> want
> users click them and try to run.
> Thanks,
>|||I think it is labeled "Hide Report"
--
Wayne Snyder MCDBA, SQL Server MVP
Mariner, Charlotte, NC
I support the Professional Association for SQL Server ( PASS) and it''s
community of SQL Professionals.
"Bruce L-C [MVP]" wrote:
> In report manager there is a properties tab, there is a check box for not
> showing it in list view.
>
> --
> Bruce Loehle-Conger
> MVP SQL Server Reporting Services
> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:8815E795-7DA9-4190-AC09-3E669725A84D@.microsoft.com...
> > Hello,
> > How can I make my sub-reports invisible in the report manager, I do not
> > want
> > users click them and try to run.
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>

Q: Report Deployment

Hello,
I have two questions:
1. When I debug my application it seems it deploys reports to report
manager, how can I prevent that from happening, I would like to deploy when I
chose deploy command only?
2. I have a report which has many sub-report, when I deploy sub-reports are
deployed to report manager to and they become visible in the report manager
screen., so user my chose and try to run them, I would like to make only my
main report be visible on the report manager, is there anyway to accomplish
this?
Thanks,Jim H,
Assuming you're using 2000
1. I'm a little confused about your intent in #1, but you can go into
the project configuration manager and change the Debug Local settings
and configure the target server. Keep in mind, if you build the
project, it will try to deploy the reports somewhere. If you're just
trying check out formatting, use the preview tab.
2. You'll need to deploy reports using a script leveraging rs.exe is
you're looking to automate configuration changes to the reports as part
of deployment. Check out Jasper Smith's tool for generating scripts to
manage RS. http://www.sqldbatips.com/showarticle.asp?ID=62
Andy Potter