Showing posts with label installed. Show all posts
Showing posts with label installed. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

Queries used in V?deo for Beginners

Hi,

I just installed reporting services and now starting with the video tutorial for reporting services(http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/express/aa718391.aspx)

In Video 10 and 11 some queries are used to demonstrate building reports. I would like to repeat the steps in the video but I need the SQL Queries used in those videos.

Does anyone have any idea where I can download those SQL queries in order to programm the same reports as shown in the videos?

Many thanks for your replies and best regards from Switzerland

Chris

The samples have moved to Codeplex download and install the samples and databases, attach the database and go to the SQL Server folder to subfolder 90 and you will see the samples open the Reporting samples AdventureWorks Samples double click the solution file and if you have SSRS installed VS2005 will open the Reports solution you can look at the code. Hope this helps.


http://www.codeplex.com/MSFTDBProdSamples/Release/ProjectReleases.aspx?ReleaseId=4004

sql

queries take a long time after sp2 installation

Has anyone had thsi issue, if so what was the fix?

We installed service pack2, the day after 2 of our production jobs started taking a long time to complete and causing a ton of blocking.

it went from running in 2 minutes to now taking 3 hours and 29 minutes to run. Can someone help?

Is it only certain queries running slower or is it all queries running slower? What high-level symptoms are you seeing? Does it look like CPU pressure, memory pressure, I/O pressure, blocking, etc.?

What kind of results do you get when you run these DMV queries?

-- Total waits are wait_time_ms (high signal waits indicates CPU pressure)

SELECT signal_wait_time_ms=SUM(signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%signal (cpu) waits' = CAST(100.0 * SUM(signal_wait_time_ms) / SUM (wait_time_ms) AS NUMERIC(20,2))

,resource_wait_time_ms=SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%resource waits'= CAST(100.0 * SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms) / SUM (wait_time_ms) AS NUMERIC(20,2))

FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats

-- Check SQL Server Schedulers to see if they are waiting on CPU

SELECT scheduler_id, current_tasks_count, runnable_tasks_count

FROM sys.dm_os_schedulers

WHERE scheduler_id < 255

-- Isolate top waits

WITH Waits AS

(

SELECT

wait_type,

wait_time_ms / 1000. AS wait_time_s,

100. * wait_time_ms / SUM(wait_time_ms) OVER() AS pct,

ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY wait_time_ms DESC) AS rn

FROM sys.dm_os_wait_stats

WHERE wait_type NOT LIKE '%SLEEP%'

-- filter out additional irrelevant waits

)

SELECT

W1.wait_type,

CAST(W1.wait_time_s AS DECIMAL(12, 2)) AS wait_time_s,

CAST(W1.pct AS DECIMAL(12, 2)) AS pct,

CAST(SUM(W2.pct) AS DECIMAL(12, 2)) AS running_pct

FROM Waits AS W1

INNER JOIN Waits AS W2

ON W2.rn <= W1.rn

GROUP BY W1.rn, W1.wait_type, W1.wait_time_s, W1.pct

HAVING SUM(W2.pct) - W1.pct < 90 -- percentage threshold

ORDER BY W1.rn;

-- Detect blocking

SELECT blocked_query.session_id AS blocked_session_id,

blocking_query.session_id AS blocking_session_id,

sql_text.text AS blocked_text,

sql_btext.text AS blocking_text,

waits.wait_type AS blocking_resource

FROM sys.dm_exec_requests AS blocked_query

INNER JOIN sys.dm_exec_requests AS blocking_query

ON blocked_query.blocking_session_id = blocking_query.session_id

CROSS APPLY

(SELECT *

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocking_query.sql_handle)

) sql_btext

CROSS APPLY

(SELECT *

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocked_query.sql_handle)

) sql_text

INNER JOIN sys.dm_os_waiting_tasks AS waits

ON waits.session_id = blocking_query.session_id

|||After the SP2 Upgrade did you update the stats and index rebuilds on the tables?. You might want to perform some optimization and see if the problem still persists.|||

If you have not done so already, try running sp_UpdateStats on your database(s). This will run UPDATE STATISTICS with the default 10% sample rate on every table in the database (which may take a while, depending on your hardware and db size).

You should always do that after upgrading to SQL Server 2005

Rebuilding (as opposed to reorganizing) indexes will also automatically update statistics.

|||Hi,

We have experienced many slowness and trouble since the SP2 was installed.
Have a look at theses 2 KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/937745
And
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/933564/en-us

Last point, run the following query when your server is slow:

select type, sum(single_pages_kb+multi_pages_kb) 'total memory' from sys.dm_os_memory_clerks ORDER by 2 DESC

This will help you to know what cache type is getting most of your SQL Ram.
If it's USERSTORE_TOKENPERM, consider using Trace flag 4618. It has had good impact on our system, but still not correct the case. I have conf call with MS Support on Monday about that point and will answer in this post if I have anymore informations.

Regards,
Jeremy
|||

Jeremy - Just wondering if you had any updates. We are currently hitting this issue. The clearing of ('TokenAndPermUserStore') does not work 100% of the time. We've experienced times when the system is so busy that we can not clear it fast enough.

We are considering using the trace flag.

Thanks -

Sam.

queries take a long time after sp2 installation

Has anyone had thsi issue, if so what was the fix?

We installed service pack2, the day after 2 of our production jobs started taking a long time to complete and causing a ton of blocking.

it went from running in 2 minutes to now taking 3 hours and 29 minutes to run. Can someone help?

Is it only certain queries running slower or is it all queries running slower? What high-level symptoms are you seeing? Does it look like CPU pressure, memory pressure, I/O pressure, blocking, etc.?

What kind of results do you get when you run these DMV queries?

-- Total waits are wait_time_ms (high signal waits indicates CPU pressure)

SELECT signal_wait_time_ms=SUM(signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%signal (cpu) waits'=CAST(100.0 *SUM(signal_wait_time_ms)/SUM(wait_time_ms)ASNUMERIC(20,2))

,resource_wait_time_ms=SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%resource waits'=CAST(100.0 *SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms)/SUM(wait_time_ms)ASNUMERIC(20,2))

FROMsys.dm_os_wait_stats

-- Check SQL Server Schedulers to see if they are waiting on CPU

SELECT scheduler_id, current_tasks_count, runnable_tasks_count

FROMsys.dm_os_schedulers

WHERE scheduler_id < 255

-- Isolate top waits

WITH Waits AS

(

SELECT

wait_type,

wait_time_ms / 1000. AS wait_time_s,

100. * wait_time_ms /SUM(wait_time_ms)OVER()AS pct,

ROW_NUMBER()OVER(ORDERBY wait_time_ms DESC)AS rn

FROMsys.dm_os_wait_stats

WHERE wait_type NOTLIKE'%SLEEP%'

-- filter out additional irrelevant waits

)

SELECT

W1.wait_type,

CAST(W1.wait_time_s ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS wait_time_s,

CAST(W1.pct ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS pct,

CAST(SUM(W2.pct)ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS running_pct

FROM Waits AS W1

INNERJOIN Waits AS W2

ON W2.rn <= W1.rn

GROUPBY W1.rn, W1.wait_type, W1.wait_time_s, W1.pct

HAVINGSUM(W2.pct)- W1.pct < 90 -- percentage threshold

ORDERBY W1.rn;

-- Detect blocking

SELECT blocked_query.session_id AS blocked_session_id,

blocking_query.session_id AS blocking_session_id,

sql_text.text AS blocked_text,

sql_btext.text AS blocking_text,

waits.wait_type AS blocking_resource

FROMsys.dm_exec_requestsAS blocked_query

INNERJOINsys.dm_exec_requestsAS blocking_query

ON blocked_query.blocking_session_id = blocking_query.session_id

CROSSAPPLY

(SELECT*

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocking_query.sql_handle)

) sql_btext

CROSSAPPLY

(SELECT*

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocked_query.sql_handle)

) sql_text

INNERJOINsys.dm_os_waiting_tasksAS waits

ON waits.session_id = blocking_query.session_id

|||After the SP2 Upgrade did you update the stats and index rebuilds on the tables?. You might want to perform some optimization and see if the problem still persists.|||

If you have not done so already, try running sp_UpdateStats on your database(s). This will run UPDATE STATISTICS with the default 10% sample rate on every table in the database (which may take a while, depending on your hardware and db size).

You should always do that after upgrading to SQL Server 2005

Rebuilding (as opposed to reorganizing) indexes will also automatically update statistics.

|||Hi,

We have experienced many slowness and trouble since the SP2 was installed.
Have a look at theses 2 KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/937745
And
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/933564/en-us

Last point, run the following query when your server is slow:

select type, sum(single_pages_kb+multi_pages_kb) 'total memory' from sys.dm_os_memory_clerks ORDER by 2 DESC

This will help you to know what cache type is getting most of your SQL Ram.
If it's USERSTORE_TOKENPERM, consider using Trace flag 4618. It has had good impact on our system, but still not correct the case. I have conf call with MS Support on Monday about that point and will answer in this post if I have anymore informations.

Regards,
Jeremy
|||

Jeremy - Just wondering if you had any updates. We are currently hitting this issue. The clearing of ('TokenAndPermUserStore') does not work 100% of the time. We've experienced times when the system is so busy that we can not clear it fast enough.

We are considering using the trace flag.

Thanks -

Sam.

queries take a long time after sp2 installation

Has anyone had thsi issue, if so what was the fix?

We installed service pack2, the day after 2 of our production jobs started taking a long time to complete and causing a ton of blocking.

it went from running in 2 minutes to now taking 3 hours and 29 minutes to run. Can someone help?

Is it only certain queries running slower or is it all queries running slower? What high-level symptoms are you seeing? Does it look like CPU pressure, memory pressure, I/O pressure, blocking, etc.?

What kind of results do you get when you run these DMV queries?

-- Total waits are wait_time_ms (high signal waits indicates CPU pressure)

SELECT signal_wait_time_ms=SUM(signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%signal (cpu) waits'=CAST(100.0 *SUM(signal_wait_time_ms)/SUM(wait_time_ms)ASNUMERIC(20,2))

,resource_wait_time_ms=SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms)

,'%resource waits'=CAST(100.0 *SUM(wait_time_ms - signal_wait_time_ms)/SUM(wait_time_ms)ASNUMERIC(20,2))

FROMsys.dm_os_wait_stats

-- Check SQL Server Schedulers to see if they are waiting on CPU

SELECT scheduler_id, current_tasks_count, runnable_tasks_count

FROMsys.dm_os_schedulers

WHERE scheduler_id < 255

-- Isolate top waits

WITH Waits AS

(

SELECT

wait_type,

wait_time_ms / 1000. AS wait_time_s,

100. * wait_time_ms /SUM(wait_time_ms)OVER()AS pct,

ROW_NUMBER()OVER(ORDERBY wait_time_ms DESC)AS rn

FROMsys.dm_os_wait_stats

WHERE wait_type NOTLIKE'%SLEEP%'

-- filter out additional irrelevant waits

)

SELECT

W1.wait_type,

CAST(W1.wait_time_s ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS wait_time_s,

CAST(W1.pct ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS pct,

CAST(SUM(W2.pct)ASDECIMAL(12, 2))AS running_pct

FROM Waits AS W1

INNERJOIN Waits AS W2

ON W2.rn <= W1.rn

GROUPBY W1.rn, W1.wait_type, W1.wait_time_s, W1.pct

HAVINGSUM(W2.pct)- W1.pct < 90 -- percentage threshold

ORDERBY W1.rn;

-- Detect blocking

SELECT blocked_query.session_id AS blocked_session_id,

blocking_query.session_id AS blocking_session_id,

sql_text.text AS blocked_text,

sql_btext.text AS blocking_text,

waits.wait_type AS blocking_resource

FROMsys.dm_exec_requestsAS blocked_query

INNERJOINsys.dm_exec_requestsAS blocking_query

ON blocked_query.blocking_session_id = blocking_query.session_id

CROSSAPPLY

(SELECT*

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocking_query.sql_handle)

) sql_btext

CROSSAPPLY

(SELECT*

FROM sys.dm_exec_sql_text(blocked_query.sql_handle)

) sql_text

INNERJOINsys.dm_os_waiting_tasksAS waits

ON waits.session_id = blocking_query.session_id

|||After the SP2 Upgrade did you update the stats and index rebuilds on the tables?. You might want to perform some optimization and see if the problem still persists.|||

If you have not done so already, try running sp_UpdateStats on your database(s). This will run UPDATE STATISTICS with the default 10% sample rate on every table in the database (which may take a while, depending on your hardware and db size).

You should always do that after upgrading to SQL Server 2005

Rebuilding (as opposed to reorganizing) indexes will also automatically update statistics.

|||Hi,

We have experienced many slowness and trouble since the SP2 was installed.
Have a look at theses 2 KB:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/937745
And
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/933564/en-us

Last point, run the following query when your server is slow:

select type, sum(single_pages_kb+multi_pages_kb) 'total memory' from sys.dm_os_memory_clerks ORDER by 2 DESC

This will help you to know what cache type is getting most of your SQL Ram.
If it's USERSTORE_TOKENPERM, consider using Trace flag 4618. It has had good impact on our system, but still not correct the case. I have conf call with MS Support on Monday about that point and will answer in this post if I have anymore informations.

Regards,
Jeremy
|||

Jeremy - Just wondering if you had any updates. We are currently hitting this issue. The clearing of ('TokenAndPermUserStore') does not work 100% of the time. We've experienced times when the system is so busy that we can not clear it fast enough.

We are considering using the trace flag.

Thanks -

Sam.

Monday, March 12, 2012

ql server does not allow remote connections

hi,

sql server 2005 express is installed on comp1. my client application is installed on comp2 and comp3. all comps have win xp. when i run my application, it can't connect to sql server express. i got the following message:

an error has occured while establishing a connection to the server. when connecting to sql server 2005, the failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings sql server does not allow remote connections. (provider: sql network interfaces, error 26 - error locating server/instance specified)

so, how can i solve this problem, to connect to the server?

hi,

SQLExpress installs by default disabling network protocols so that only local connections are available..

you have to run the SQL Server Surface Area Configuration (for services and connections) and enable remote connections..

then run SQL Server Configuration Manager and, in the SQL Server 2005 Network Configuration, enable the desired/required protocol(s) for the instance you are interested with...

additionally, you have to configure firewall exceptions on the pc hosting SQLExpress..

regards

|||

These articles will help walk you through Andrea's suggestions:

Configuration -Configure SQL Server 2005 to allow remote connections
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;914277
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlexpress/archive/2005/05/05/415084.aspx

Configuration -Connect to SQL Express from "downlevel clients"
http://blogs.msdn.com/sqlexpress/archive/2004/07/23/192044.aspx

Configuration -Connect to SQL Express and ‘Stay Connected’
http://betav.com/blog/billva/2006/06/getting_and_staying_connected.html

Configuration - Guideline for Connectivity Question Posting
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=362498&SiteID=1

|||thanx a lot both !

Monday, February 20, 2012

Q: SP4

Hello,
I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I need to
install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without installing
SP3.
Thanks,Jim
Service Packs are cumulated , so you don'yt need to intstall SP3
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:E9671444-4D27-465F-9D75-08F5894794E0@.microsoft.com...
> Hello,
> I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I need
> to
> install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without installing
> SP3.
> Thanks,
>|||Thanks for the reply. Is this the case for all application of Microsoft? I am
just wondering.
"Uri Dimant" wrote:
> Jim
> Service Packs are cumulated , so you don'yt need to intstall SP3
>
> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:E9671444-4D27-465F-9D75-08F5894794E0@.microsoft.com...
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I need
> > to
> > install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without installing
> > SP3.
> > Thanks,
> >
>
>|||Jim
I think yes , however I was talking about SQL Server.
"JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:49DB4A2A-5BBF-4384-9E9A-C6FF0DB8DF2E@.microsoft.com...
> Thanks for the reply. Is this the case for all application of Microsoft? I
> am
> just wondering.
> "Uri Dimant" wrote:
>> Jim
>> Service Packs are cumulated , so you don'yt need to intstall SP3
>>
>> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:E9671444-4D27-465F-9D75-08F5894794E0@.microsoft.com...
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I
>> > need
>> > to
>> > install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without
>> > installing
>> > SP3.
>> > Thanks,
>> >
>>|||Thanks Uri.
"Uri Dimant" wrote:
> Jim
> I think yes , however I was talking about SQL Server.
> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:49DB4A2A-5BBF-4384-9E9A-C6FF0DB8DF2E@.microsoft.com...
> > Thanks for the reply. Is this the case for all application of Microsoft? I
> > am
> > just wondering.
> >
> > "Uri Dimant" wrote:
> >
> >> Jim
> >> Service Packs are cumulated , so you don'yt need to intstall SP3
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:E9671444-4D27-465F-9D75-08F5894794E0@.microsoft.com...
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I
> >> > need
> >> > to
> >> > install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without
> >> > installing
> >> > SP3.
> >> > Thanks,
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>|||JIM.H. wrote:
> Thanks Uri.
> "Uri Dimant" wrote:
>> Jim
>> I think yes , however I was talking about SQL Server.
>> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:49DB4A2A-5BBF-4384-9E9A-C6FF0DB8DF2E@.microsoft.com...
>> Thanks for the reply. Is this the case for all application of Microsoft? I
>> am
>> just wondering.
>> "Uri Dimant" wrote:
>> Jim
>> Service Packs are cumulated , so you don'yt need to intstall SP3
>>
>> "JIM.H." <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
>> news:E9671444-4D27-465F-9D75-08F5894794E0@.microsoft.com...
>> Hello,
>> I just installed SQL Server 2000, I noticed that there is SP4, do I
>> need
>> to
>> install SP3 and then SP4 or I just directly jump to SP4 without
>> installing
>> SP3.
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
If you took the time to read a few lines about SP4 on
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=8E2DFC8D-C20E-4446-99A9-B7F0213F8BC5&displaylang=en
, you'd see -
"SP4 is a cumulative Service Pack containing all of the fixes from
previous service packs, including MS03-031 security bulletin."
It would have taken you less time than going to this newsgroup and post
the question.
Regards
Steen

Q: run reports in another machine

Hello,
Can I deploy my reports to another machine which does not have a SQL Server
installed and run it from there?
Thanks,
Jim.Yes. You can install RS on a server that has IIS installed. Then point the
new RS installation to use your designated SQL Server.
--
| Thread-Topic: run reports in another machine
| thread-index: AcVwFODsaBcOS7MHRumvBdJ2Zzyw7w==| X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 216.26.230.88
| From: =?Utf-8?B?SklNLkgu?= <JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com>
| Subject: Q: run reports in another machine
| Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 05:39:02 -0700
| Lines: 8
| Message-ID: <AF088332-758D-4D91-AF56-AE22AB606213@.microsoft.com>
| MIME-Version: 1.0
| Content-Type: text/plain;
| charset="Utf-8"
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
| X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
| Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
| Importance: normal
| Priority: normal
| X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
| Newsgroups: microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs
| NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
| Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
| Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs:45811
| X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs
|
| Hello,
|
| Can I deploy my reports to another machine which does not have a SQL
Server
| installed and run it from there?
|
| Thanks,
| Jim.
|
|

Q: RS2000 what OS?

Hello,
Can I install reporting services in a XP Pro, or windows 2000. We have SQL
Server 2000 installed on XP Pro, I was trying to install RS2000 and I got a
message it sais OS should be a server. Does that mean RS2000 can only be
installed on a server? Can I install RS2000 on a windows 2000 machine?PiBDYW4gSSBpbnN0YWxsIHJlcG9ydGluZyBzZXJ2aWNlcyBpbiBhIFhQIFBybywgb3Igd2luZG93
cyAyMDAwLiBXZSBoYXZlIFNRTCANCj4gU2VydmVyIDIwMDAgaW5zdGFsbGVkIG9uIFhQIFBybywg
SSB3YXMgdHJ5aW5nIHRvIGluc3RhbGwgUlMyMDAwIGFuZCBJIGdvdCBhIA0KPiBtZXNzYWdlIGl0
IHNhaXMgT1Mgc2hvdWxkIGJlIGEgc2VydmVyLiBEb2VzIHRoYXQgbWVhbiBSUzIwMDAgY2FuIG9u
bHkgYmUgDQo+IGluc3RhbGxlZCBvbiBhIHNlcnZlcj8gQ2FuIEkgaW5zdGFsbCBSUzIwMDAgb24g
YSB3aW5kb3dzIDIwMDAgbWFjaGluZT8NCg0KaHR0cDovL21zZG4ubWljcm9zb2Z0LmNvbS9saWJy
YXJ5L2VuLXVzL1JTaW5zdGFsbC9odG0vZ3NfaW5zdGFsbGluZ3JzX3YxXzhqb20uYXNw

Q: RS on XP

Hello,

I have SQL Server 2000 installed on my Windows XP, can I install Reporting Services to this machine? If yes, where can I get it?

Thanks,

No you can't install SRS Server on an XP machine. You could fiind more info onhttp://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/default.mspx
|||

Thank you for the reply. I could not really locate it, can you tell me the exact URL that tells we can not install it to XP. I need to send it to my manager.

Thanks,

|||http://www.microsoft.com/sql/reporting/productinfo/sysreqs.mspx
The above url won't show you how to install SRS it will just show your manager that you can't install the server componets on an XP box. You can only install the development edition as per the URL above.|||

Is there anyway I can download the developer edition on the internet? I think the trial RS version is Enterprise, I have SQL Server license what should I do to get RS Developer if it is not in the internet?
Thanks for your help.

|||

Unfortuneatly I don't know of any site where you can download developer edition of RS. You should be able to install the development part of Enterprise SRS on your XP machine. However you won't be able to host SRS reports, for this you'll need a server OS.

q: reporting service in SQL 2005

Hello,
I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2005 Pro machine, will I be able
to use Reporting service to deploy the reports here? Is there any web site
that show step by step how I can do that?
Thanks,On Sun, 21 May 2006 04:59:02 -0700, JIM.H.
<JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2005 Pro machine, will I be able
>to use Reporting service to deploy the reports here? Is there any web site
>that show step by step how I can do that?
>Thanks,
Jim,
There is no Windows 2005. I guess you mean Windows XP Pro.
XP Pro is really appropriate only for a development machine for SQL
Server 2005.There are technical and potential licensing issues.
Questions on Reporting Services are better directed to the
microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs newsgroup.
There is series of webcasts under way on Reporting Services 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/events.
Andrew Watt MVP

q: reporting service in SQL 2005

Hello,
I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2005 Pro machine, will I be able
to use Reporting service to deploy the reports here? Is there any web site
that show step by step how I can do that?
Thanks,On Sun, 21 May 2006 04:59:02 -0700, JIM.H.
<JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2005 Pro machine, will I be able
>to use Reporting service to deploy the reports here? Is there any web site
>that show step by step how I can do that?
>Thanks,
Jim,
There is no Windows 2005. I guess you mean Windows XP Pro.
XP Pro is really appropriate only for a development machine for SQL
Server 2005.There are technical and potential licensing issues.
Questions on Reporting Services are better directed to the
microsoft.public.sqlserver.reportingsvcs newsgroup.
There is series of webcasts under way on Reporting Services 2005 at
http://www.microsoft.com/events.
Andrew Watt MVP

q: reporting service 2005

Hello,
I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2000 Pro machine, I have
following question:
1. will I be able to use Reporting services to deploy the reports to the
same machine as a report server?
2. Can I modify and deploy mo old reports written in RS2000
3. Is there any web site that show step by step how I can work with RS2005?
Thanks,On Sun, 21 May 2006 09:36:01 -0700, JIM.H.
<JIMH@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>Hello,
>I installed SQL Server 2005 into a Windows 2000 Pro machine, I have
>following question:
>1. will I be able to use Reporting services to deploy the reports to the
>same machine as a report server?
Yes, you should be able to do that. Consider performance implications
if the server is anything but lightly loaded.
>2. Can I modify and deploy mo old reports written in RS2000
Yes, but it's a one way process (for most practical purposes). Once
you have opened an RS2000 report in BIDS and deployed it on RS2005 you
won't be able (without some hand editing) to deploy the report at a
future date on an RS2000 server.
If you have a possible need to return/use RS2000 make a backup in the
old format before deploying on RS2005.
>3. Is there any web site that show step by step how I can work with RS2005?
Books Online has a lot of useful information.
Also take a look at http://www.microsoft.com/events. There is a series
of RS2005 webcasts underway.
Andrew Watt MVP
>Thanks,